Latest News
The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI) released on 13 November 2026 the report of its Committee on Knowledge Systems, an Actionable Policy Paper on measuring the contribution of knowledge and knowledge products to the economy. It recommends thematic statistics and accounts rather than one aggregate measure, and public feedback is invited by 12 December 2026.
Background
MoSPI began work in 2025: a meeting chaired by the Principal Scientific Adviser on 10 February 2025, a Technical Advisory Group in May 2025, a workshop on 30 September 2025 and a Base Paper in May 2026. The Committee on Knowledge Systems was constituted on 5 May 2026 under Shri Ratan P. Watal.
- Base Paper (May 2026)
- Committee constituted 5 May 2026
- Actionable Policy Paper
- Public feedback till 12 December 2026
Key facts:
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Ministry | Statistics and Programme Implementation |
| Committee chair | Shri Ratan P. Watal |
| Output | Actionable Policy Paper |
| Ecosystem | Eight interrelated components |
| Accounting standard | Consistent with SNA 2025 |
| Feedback deadline | 12 December 2026 |
Why does it matter?
Knowledge now drives productivity and value creation, but the economy has no single account that shows how much it contributes. The release says AI systems can generate knowledge and solutions beyond conventional human creation, which makes measurement harder and more urgent.
The Committee's paper proposes a practical route: instead of one aggregate figure, a set of thematic accounts that can be built step by step, starting with the areas that matter most for growth and competitiveness.
Significance
- Measuring knowledge shows strengths, capability gaps and priorities for the Viksit Bharat vision.
- The paper notes that AI systems now generate knowledge in ways beyond conventional human creation, so measurement must adapt.
- It sets five boundary conditions to identify knowledge products: knowledge as input, content, identifiability, codification and economic value.
Issues and challenges
- The paper says measuring the whole ecosystem at once is infeasible.
- The boundaries are guiding principles, not rigid criteria, so classification can vary.
- Data must come from many institutions, which needs coordination.
Stakeholder view:
| Role in the proposed model | Who |
|---|---|
| System integrators | Provide the common measurement framework |
| Domain institutions | Sectoral ministries and departments |
| Key partners | State Governments, regulators, academia |
What the paper proposes: The paper outlines a Knowledge Ecosystem and proposes boundary conditions to decide what counts as a knowledge product. It says such boundaries are broad guiding principles that leave room for the diversity of products.
It also asks that priorities among components be set by contribution to growth, productivity, competitiveness, inclusive growth and livelihoods, future significance and cost-effective measurability.
Way forward
- Develop a family of SNA 2025-consistent thematic statistics or accounts.
- Start with Human Capital, R&D, Creative Economy, AI systems, Data and Databases, High-Tech Products and Frontier Technologies, and Digital Economy.
- Use a federated model that shares responsibilities by institutional mandate.
Uttar Pradesh angle
State Governments are listed as key partners in the proposed federated model, so Uttar Pradesh's statistical, education and research bodies could supply data on areas such as human capital and R&D. For GS-V, treat this as a governance link: national accounts depend on state data systems.
Value-addition points for Mains
- Similar efforts include a Culture Satellite Account begun in 2025 and a 2025 study of the Digital Economy's contribution to GDP for 2022-23.
- Work is also under way on measuring the Space Economy's contribution to GDP.
- The paper proposes eight ecosystem components from knowledge to knowledge application.
Essay use: argue that what a country measures shapes what it prioritises, using knowledge accounts as the example.
Key Terms
- Knowledge product
- Output that carries codified, identifiable knowledge with economic value.
- SNA 2025
- The 2025 System of National Accounts standard.
- Satellite account
- A supplementary account for a sector within national accounts.
- Federated model
- Responsibilities shared across institutions by mandate.
- TAG
- Technical Advisory Group.
UPPSC syllabus: GS-II, GS-III
FAQs
How can the public give feedback?
By email to the Ministry listed in the release, by 12 December 2026.
Sources: PIB: Inviting feedback and suggestions on the Report submitted by Committee on Knowledge Systems
Last verified: 2026-11-14